Article - Problems of Modern Economics

Finnish school of academic research in the sphere of inter-firm cooperation: evolution, specificities and perspectives for development (Russia, St. Petersburg)

The article discusses the key aspects of research conducted by Finnish scholars in the sphere of inter-firm cooperation and the forms that corporations assume as a result of it. The author describes the Finnish school of academic research, its major features, limitations for its development, and the possibilities of borrowing the experience of the Finnish school in different economic systems, in particular, within the Russian research tradition

Key words: Russia, international economic relations, inter-firm cooperation, academic school, strategic alliance, Finland

Pages: 308 - 312

Статья написана по результатам исследований, проведенных автором в процессе прохождения научной стажировки по гранту Erasmus Mundus Action 2 (уровень Doctorate, срок 6 месяцев) в университете г. Турку, Финляндия.

Литература
1. Шлямин В. Финляндия для России — крупный технологический партнер [Электронный ресурс] // Министерство экономического развития Российской Федерации [Офиц. сайт]. URL: http://economy.gov.ru/minec/press/interview/201411142 (дата обращения: 18.04.2015).
2. Hellman, P., Hovi, N., Nieminen, J. Conceptualization of the terms used in interfirm cooperation research: special emphasis on «strategic alliances» and «joint ventures» — Turku: Turun kauppakorkeakoulu, 1993.
3. Доклад профессора Р. Блэкберна (Robert Blackburn) «Disseminating your research output: How to publish in an academic journal» в рамках исследовательского семинара в Университете Турку, от 18 сентября 2013 г.
4. Пивоваров И.С. Антикризисный опыт Финляндии: структурно-институциональные реформы в промышленности // Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета экономики и финансов. — 2012. — №6. — С. 69.
5. Salmi, A. Institutionally changing business networks: an analysis of a Finnish company’s operations in exporting to the Soviet Union, Russia and the Baltic States — Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 1995.
6. Mantere, T. Joint ventures in China: the establishment and approval process — Helsinki, Finland :Ministry of Trade and Industry, Industry Dept., 1995.
7. Stenbacka, R., Tombak, M.M..Commitment and efficiency in research joint ventures — Еbo: Еbo Akademi, nationalekonomiska institutionen, 1993.
8. Al-Obaidi, Z. International technology transfer control: a case study of joint ventures in developing countries — [Helsinki]: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 1999.
9. Lu, Y., Bjorkman, I. HRM practices in China-Western joint ventures: MNC standardization versus localization — International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1997.
10. Van der Windt, N., Ruotsi, J., Van Doorn, J. Joint ventures and aid: evaluation of Finnfund: final report — Netherlands Economic Institute, Analytical Methods, Macro Economics and International Trade Department — [Helsinki]: Finnida, 1993.
11. Nikkanen, K. International strategic alliances in the airline industry: the strategic alliance of Scandinavian Airlines System and Deutsche Lufthansa AG — Turku, 1996.
12. Takalo, T., Kultti, K. Incomlete contracting in a research joint venture: Micronas-case — Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, 1998.
13. Murto-Koivisto, E., Vesalainen, J. Network management and interfirm cooperation — Vaasa: University of Vaasa, 1994.
14. Matikainen, E. Conceptual analysis of contractual relationships case — Helsinki: Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulu, 1995.
15. Hennart, J.F.; Larimo, J. The impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions? // Journal Of International Business Studies — 1998. — N3 — P. 515–538.
16. Laamanen, T. Option nature of company acquisitions motivated by competence acquisition // Small Business Economics — 1999. — N2 — P.149–168.
17. Larimo, J. Choice of organizational structure in foreign markets: the impact of ownership and location specific determinants on the foreign direct investment behavior of Nordic firms — Vaasa: University of Vaasa, 1999.
18. Третьяк О.А, Румянцева М.А. Сетевые формы межфирменной кооперации: подходы к объяснению феномена // Российский журнал менеджмента — 2003. — N 2. — С. 25–50.
19. Kleymann, B., Seristo, H. Levels of airline alliance membership: balancing risks and benefits // Journal of Air Transport Management — 2001. — N5 — P. 303–310.
20. Peltomäki, M. Interorganizational learning in strategic alliances: a case study of Orion Pharma — Turku: Turun kauppakorkeakoulu, 2002.
21. Valkonen, E. International Dyadic Strategic Alliances: Examining Their Operation– Turku: Turun kauppakorkeakoulu, 2002.
22. Palmberg, C. Determinants of internationalisation through strategic alliances: insights based on new data on large Finnish firms — Helsinki: ETLA, 2005.
23. Niemelä, T. Inter-firm co-operation capability in the context of networking family firms: conceptual analysis and theoretical framework — Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2002.
24. Varamaki, E., Vesalainen, J. Modelling different types of multilateral co-operation between SMEs // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development — 2003. — N1 — P. 27–47.
25. Jarimo, T. Innovation incentives in enterprise networks: A game theoretic approach — Helsinki: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2004.
26. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S. «Coopetition» in business networks — to cooperate and compete simultaneously // Industrial Marketing Management — 2000. — N5 — P. 411–426.
27. Рекорд С.И. Развитие промышленно-инновационных кластеров в Европе: эволюция и современная дискуссия: монография. — СПб.: Изд-во СПбГУЭФ, 2010.
28. Шиляев А.В. Развитие информационно-коммуникационных бизнес-экосистем высокотехнологичных ТНК (на примере компании Nokia): автореферат дисс. ... канд. экон. наук — СПб., 2013. — 24 с.
29. Lintunen K. Managing high-tech strategic alliances in the open standards environment: Framework for strategy development in the converging industries. — Turku, 2005.
30. Ali, T. Integrative perspective of social exchange theory and transaction cost theory on the antecedents of trust and trust-performance relationship in international joint ventures: evidence from Nordic multinational firms. — Vaasa: University of Vaasa, 2013.
31. Minbaeva D., Pedersen T., Bjorkman I. et al. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM // Journal of International Business Studies — 2014. — N1 — P. 38–51.
32. Rusko R. Perspectives on value creation and Coopetition // Problems and Perspectives in Management — 2012.
33. Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management // Strategic Management Journal — 1997. — N7. — P. 509–533.
34. Khalid S., Larimo J. Firm Specific Advantage in Developed Markets Dynamic Capability Perspective // Management International Review — 2012. — N2 — P. 233–250.
35. Partanen J., Servais P. Sourcing networks of born global firms // Handbook of Research on Born Globals — 2012. — P. 145–160.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content


Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2024