Start Page
Information About the Journal
Magazine Subscription
Thematic profile of the Journal
The latest
Issues List
Editorial Council
Editorial Board
Magazine Representatives
Article Submission Guidelines
Postaljuk M. P.
Head of the Chair of Economic Theory of Economic Innovations, The Academy of Management “TISBI,” PhD (Economics), Professor

Innovative component in the present-day Eurasian political economy (Russia, Kazan’)
The article is based on the research focused on the contemporary situation and evolution of innovative components in the present-day Eurasian political economy. The author distinguishes specific features of the nature and dynamics of the present-day Eurasian political economy and its implementation. The article discusses dynamic stability as the key characteristic of the regional economic system with regards to creation, accumulation and development of its innovative mutual relations.
Key words: Eurasian political economy, innovative processes, innovative nature
Pages: 28 - 30

1. Hospers Gert-Jan (2005). Joseph Schumpeter and His Legасу in Innovation Studies. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, Fall 2005, Vol. 18. N 3. Р. 20–37; Sтits R. (2002). Innovation studies in the 21st century: Questions from a user’s perspective // Technological Forecasting & Social Change 69. P. 861–883; Lаrаjаа М., Uyarra Е., Flапаgаn К. (2008). Роlicies fог science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting // Research Policy, 37, P. 823–835.
2. Кондратьев Н.Д. Mировое хозяйство и его конъюнктура (Мировая экономика и ее рыночная среда во время войны и после нее. — Вологда: Областное отделение государственного издательства, 1922; Кондратьев Н.Д. Большие циклы конъюнктуры [Длинные циклы рыночной среды] // Вопросы конъюнктуры. — 1925. — № 1/1. — С. 28–79; Кондратьев Н.Д. Длинные волны конъюнктуры // Архивы социальных наук и социальной политики № 56/3. — С. 573–609; Schumpeter J.A. (1912). Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung // Industry and Innovation. Vol. 9; Schumpeter J.A. (1939). Business Cycles. A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York; Toronto; London; McGraw-Hill Book Company. Schumpeter J.A. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA; Schumpeter J.A. (1943) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper, New York.
3. Bernal, J.D. (1939). The Social Function of Science. London: George Routledge & Sons Ltd.; Kuznets S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality // American Economic Review. Vol. 45. N1. R 1–28; Kuznets S. (1971). Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, December 11; Solow R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 70. Р. 65–94; Solow R. (1957). Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function // Review of Economics and Statistics. 39. Р.312–320.
4. Mensch G. (1979). Stalemate in Technology — Innovations Overcome the Depression. New York, NY: Ballinger; Foster R. (1986) Innovation: The attacker’s advantage. New York: Summit Books; Kleinknecht A. (1987). Innovation Patterns in Crisis and Prosperity. Schumpeter’s Long Cycle Reconsidered. Foreword by Jan Tinbergen. L.: Macmillan Press; Freeman C. (1974). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Анчишкин А.К. (1986). Наука — техника — экономика [Наука — Технология — Экономика]. М.: Экономика; Nelson R.R., Winter S.W. (1982). An Evolutioary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press; Romer P. (1991). Endogenous Technological Change // Journal of Political Economy 98.5. Р. 71–102; Romer P. (1994). The Origins of Endogenous Growth // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 8. Р.3–22; Mankiw G., Romer D., Weil D. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 107 (2). Р. 407–437.
5. Freeman C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective // Cambridge Journal of Economics. N. 19. Р. 5–24; Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The Dynamic of Innovations: from National System and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations Research Policy. Vol. 29. Р.109–123; Hirooka M. (2006). Innovation Dynamism and Economic Growth. A Nonlinear Perspective. Cheltenham, UK — Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing; Nelson R. (ed.) (1993). National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press., New York/Oxford; Qingrui X., Jin C., Zhangshu X. Jingjiang L., Gang Z., Yong W. (2007). Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century // Journal of Technology Transfer. 32. Р.9–25; OECD and European Commission (1997). Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: The Oslo Manual // Productivity Growth and the New Economy. Paris.
6. Perez C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Edward Elgar Publishing.
7. Фонд Европейского Регионального развития [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/thefunds/regional/ index_en.cfm#2.
8. Павлов П.Н., Жаринов А.А., Каукин А.С. Эмпирические исследования инновационных экономик. — М.: «Дело» Издательская компания Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы, 2012.
9. Postaliuk M., Vagizova V., Postaliuk T. (2013) Implementation forms of institutional support of traditional and innovative national economies development // Investment Management and Financial Innovations, № 4.
10. Сухарев О.С. (2009) Структурная политика и система стратегического планирования. // Институт экономики Российской академии наук [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: www.finanal.ru/034/strukturnaya-Politika-я-Система-strategicheskogo-planirovaniya.
11. Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M. (2008) National Innovation systems, capabilities and economic development // Research Policy. 37, P. 1417–1435
12. Шваб К. Четвертая промышленная революция. — М., 2016. — 31 с.
13. Furman, J.L, Porter, M.E., Stern S. (2002) The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity // Research Policy. 31, P. 899–933.
14. Посталюк М.П. Инновационные отношения в экономической системе (теоретико-методологический аспект): Диссертация на соискание доктора экономических наук. — Казань, 2006. — 420 с.
15. Postalyuk M. Modeling the Development of the Regional Economy: Static and Dynamic Approach / Посталюк М.П., Kokotkina T., Sadovin N., Tsaregorodsev E. // Proceedings of INTCESS 2017 — 4th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences, 6–8 February 2017. Istanbul, Turkey. — P. 530–536.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content

Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2020