Logo PROBLEMS
OF MODERN
ECONOMICS
Start Page
News
Information About the Journal
About the Editor-in-chief
Advertising
Contacts
EURASIAN INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-ANALYTICAL EDITION Russian
Thematic profile of the Journal
The latest
Issue
Announcement
Issues List
Find
Editorial Council
Editorial Board
Magazine Representatives
Article Submission Guidelines
PROBLEMS OF MODERN ECONOMICS, N 4 (72), 2019
ISSUES OF ECONOMIC THEORY. MACROECONOMICS
Averjanova O. V.
Assistant Professor, Chair of Financial Law, St. Petersburg State University of Economics, PhD (Economics)
Alipov A. S.
Assistant Professor, Chair of Economic Cybernetics, St. Petersburg State University, PhD (Economics)
Blagikh Ivan A.
Professor, Chair of the History of Economics and Economic Thought, St.Petersburg State University, PhD (Economics)
Vashchuk A. E.
Senior lecturer, Chair of European Studies, St. Petersburg State University, PhD (Economics)
Titov V. O.
Assistant Professor, Chair of Credit Theory and Financial Management, Department of Economics, St. Petersburg State University, PhD (Economics)

Comparative analysis of contemporary capitalism: theories and methodologies (Russia, St. Petersburg)
The article presents methodological approaches to research of international differences and organizational forms of capitalist socio-economic systems. Until the end of the XX c. this analysis was conducted on the basis of the original model of West European capitalism. Meeting the challenges of the present-day comparative approach, it becomes crucial to develop a methodology of capitalism analysis with regards to the states with emerging markets. On the basis of their research the authors offer four approaches that explain the mechanisms of formation of the “new capitalism” in the economies of the former socialist countries, as well as Asian, African and other traditionally non-capitalist societies. According to one of these approaches, the process of particular “hybridization” of local and Western institutions is taking place in the countries of the “new capitalism”; this process is accompanied by the “transfer” of norms and practices upon foreign markets (the so-called mutual institutional exchange phenomenon). The authors argue that precisely these “hybrid” models may become the key direction at the new stage of convergence of socio-economic systems and the dominant type of contemporary capitalism.
Key words: comparative historical methodology, typology of capitalism, emerging markets, convergence of socio-economic systems, multi-factor regression analysis
Pages: 39 - 46



Литература
1. Amable B. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
2. Aoki M., Jackson G., Miyajima H., eds. Corporate governance in Japan: Institutional change and organizational diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
3. Baumol W. J., Litan R. E., Schramm C. J. Good capitalism, bad capitalism, and the economics of growth and prosperity. Yale University Press, 2007.
4. Bergheim S. The happy variety of capitalism: characterised by an array of commonalities. Deutsche Bank Research. April 25, 2007.
5. Beware the Beijing model // The Economist. May 26, 2009.
6. Bohle D., Greskovits B. Capitalist diversity in Eastern Europe // Economic sociology_the european electronic newsletter, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG). 2007. Vol. 8(2). P. 3–9.
7. Bohle D., Greskovits B. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2012.
8. Boyer R., Uemura H., Isogai A., eds. Diversity and Transformations of Asian Capitalisms. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
9. Buchen C. Estonia and Slovenia as Antipodes. In: Lane D., Myant M., eds. Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 2006. P. 65–89.
10. Благих И.А., Газизуллин Н.Ф., Яковлева Н.Г., Титов В.О. Индустриальное общество в XXI веке: переосмысление мейнстрима российскими экономистами // Проблемы современной экономики. — 2017. — № 2(62). — С. 286–287; Carney R.W. Varieties of hierarchical capitalism: family and state market economies in East Asia // The Pacific Review. 2016. Vol. 29(2). P. 137–163.
11. Cernat L. Institutions and Economic Growth: Which Model of Capitalism for Central and Eastern Europe? // Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development, and Transition. 2002. Vol. 6, no 1. P. 18–34.
12. Cernat L. The Emerging European Corporate Governance Model: Anglo-Saxon, Continental, or Still the Century of Diversity? // Journal of European Public Policy. 2004. Vol. 11(1). P. 147–166.
13. Drahokoupil J., Myant M. Putting comparative capitalisms research in its place: varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In: New Directions in Comparative Capitalisms Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2015. P. 155–171.
14. Feldmann M. Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries: Industrial Relations and Wage Bargaining in Estonia and Slovenia // Comparative Political Studies. 2006. Vol. 39. P. 829–854.
15. Greskovits B. Leading sectors and the variety of capitalism in Eastern Europe. In: State and society in post-socialist economies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 2008. P. 19–46.
16. Hall P., Soskice D. An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
17. Iankova E. A. Eastern European Capitalism in the Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
18. JapAnglo-Saxon capitalism // The Economist. November 29, 2007.
19. King L. Central European Capitalism in Comparative Perspective. In: Hanckй B., Rhodes M., Thatcher M., eds. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 307–327.
20. King L. Postcommunist Divergence: A Comparative Analysis of the Transition to Capitalism in Poland and Russia // Studies in Comparative International Development. 2002. Vol. 37(3). P. 3–34.
21. Kuokstis V. What type of capitalism do the Baltic countries belong to? // Emecon. 2011. Vol. 1.
22. Lane D. Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Former State Socialist Societies // Competition and Change. 2005. Vol. 9(2). P. 27–47.
23. McMenamin I. Varieties of Capitalist Democracy: What Difference Does East-Central Europe Make? // Journal of Public Policy. 2004. Vol. 24(3). P. 259–274; Благих И.А. Неоиндустриализация: следует ли ожидать перехода от теоретических дебатов к практическому действию? /Проблемы современной экономики. 2014. №  2 (50). С. 392–393.
24. Molina O., Rhodes M. The political economy of adjustment in mixed market economies: A study of Spain and Italy. In: Hanckй B., Rhodes M., Thatcher M., eds. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions and Complementarities in the European Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. P. 223–252.
25. Nattrass N. A South African Variety of Capitalism? // New Political Economy. 2014. Vol. 19(1). P. 56–78
26. Nölke A., Vliegenthart A. Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe // World politics. 2009. Vol. 61(4). P. 670–702.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content

Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2024