Logo PROBLEMS
OF MODERN
ECONOMICS
Start Page
News
Information About the Journal
About the Editor-in-chief
Advertising
Contacts
EURASIAN INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-ANALYTICAL EDITION Russian
Thematic profile of the Journal
The latest
Issue
Announcement
Issues List
Find
Editorial Council
Editorial Board
Magazine Representatives
Article Submission Guidelines
PROBLEMS OF MODERN ECONOMICS, N 4 (44), 2012
ISSUES OF ECONOMIC THEORY. MACROECONOMICS
Mal’tsev A. A.
Assistant professor, Chair of Global Economy, Urals State Economic University (Ekaterinburg), PhD (Economics)

Characteristics of the major scholarly approaches to the notion of “socio-economic development” (Russia, Ekaterinburg)
The article discusses the ontology of the phenomenon “socio-economic development,” analyzes the evolution of concepts concerning the vector of development of economic processes, and shows the relative character of various logics describing economical and historical dynamics, which depend on the changes in technological and institutional landscape of the world economy
Key words: paradigmatic trichotomy, progress-based model of economical and historical process, providential historiosophy, contemporary economic growth, technological novelties, cycle-and-wave based motion, economic dynamics
Pages: 69 - 72



Статья подготовлена в рамках реализации ФЦП «Научные и научно-педагогические кадры инновационной России» на 2009–2013 годы по лоту № 16.740.11.0696 «Компаративный анализ модернизационных стратегий в мировой экономической практике»

1 Landes D.S. The Wealth and the Poverty of Nations. Why Some are so Rich and Some so Poor. N.Y., L.: W.W. Norton & Company. 1998. P. 236.
2 Рак И.В. Мифы Древнего Египта. — СПб: Изд-во «ПЕТРО-Риф», 1993. — С. 82; Howe J. Forging Dragons. — Cincinnati: A David & Charles Book. 2008. P. 30.
3 Cascio E .L., Malanima P. Ancient and Pre-Modern Economics : GDP in Roman Empire and Early Modern Europe. P. 15 / http://www.paolomalanima.it/DEFAULT_files/Papers/ANCIENT-PRE-MODERN-ECONOMIES.pdf
4 Maddison A. Contours of the World Economy, 1-2030 A.D. Essays in Macroeconomic History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. P. 70.
5 Goldsmith R.W. An Estimate of the Size and Structure of the National Product of the Early Roman Empire // Review of Income and Wealth. — 1984. Vol. 30. P. 281.
6 Agar N. Humanity’s End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press. 2010. P. 119.
7 The Faith in Progress // http://home.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/~wyng/gee/progress.html
8 Цит. по: Кнабе Г.С. Современная Европа и ее антично-римское наследие. М.: РГГУ. 2010. С. 24.
9 Nisbet R. History of the Idea of Progress. New Brunswick (NJ.): Transaction Publishers. 1994. P. 93.
10 Никулина Н.Н. Истоки идеи прогресса в творческом наследии европейских мыслителей Античности и Средневековья // Вестник МГТУ. — 2011. — № 2. — Т. 14. — С. 416.
11 Benoist A. de. A Brief History of Idea of Progress // The Occidental Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 8.
12 Maddison A. The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective. P.: OECD. 2001. P. 21, 25.
13 Bury J.B. The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into Its Origin and Growth. N.Y.: Cosimo. 2008. P. 96.
14 Цит. по: Галкин И.С. Историография Новой и Новейшей истории стран Европы и Америки. — М.: Изд-во Моск ун-та. — 1977. — С. 29.
15 Heffernan M. Historical Geographies of the Future: Three Perspectives from France, 1750–1825 / Livingstone D.N., Withers V.J. (Eds.). Geography and Enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1999. P. 131.
16 Pickering M. Auguste Comte: An Intellectual Biography. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1993. Vol. 1. P. 619–620
17 Истюфеев А.В. Кризис гуманизма в условиях современной техногенной цивилизации // Вестник ОГУ. — 2007. — № 7. — С. 59–60.
18 Hobsbawm E. The Odyssey of the Publication of the Grundrisse / Musto M. (Eds.). Karl Marx’s Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Abingdon, N.Y.: Routledge. 2008. P. XXIII
19 Механик А. Творческий труд делает свободным // Эксперт. — 2010. — №. 3. — С. 52.
20 Iggers G.G. The Idea of Progress in Historiography and Social Thought Since the Enlightenment / Almond G.A., Chodorow M., Pearce R.H. (Eds.). Progress and It’s Discontents. Berkley, Los Angeles, L.: University of California Press. 1982. P. 60.
21 Farrow B. The Ascension and Ecclesia: On the Significance of the Doctrine of the Ascension for Ecclesiology and Christian Cosmology. Edinburgh: T&T Clark Ltd. 1999. P. 191.
22 Цит. по: Alexander J.A., Sztompka P. Introduction / Alexander J.A., Sztompka P. (Eds.). Rethinking Progress and Ideas at the End of the Twentieth Century. L.: Unwin Hyman Inc. 1990. P. 4.
23 Цит. по: Salomon J-J. The Dark Side of Progress / Allen G.E., MacLeod R.M. (Eds.). Science, History and Social Activism: A Tribute to Everett Mendelsohn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2001. P. 155.
24 Beck U. Living in the World Risk Society // Economy and Society. 2006. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 338.
25 Wallerstein I.M. Unthinking Social Sciences: The Limits of Ninetieth Century Paradigms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 2001. P. 264, 270.
26 Benoist A. de. A Brief History of Idea of Progress // The Occidental Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 15.
27 Globalization of Science and Engineering Research. A Companion to Science and Engineering Indicators 2010 / http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsb1003/
28 Yuqing X. China’s High-Tech Exports: Myth and Reality. GRIPS Discussion Paper 11-05. June 2011. P. 1.
29 Рассчитано по: Statistical Abstract of the United States 2012. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office. 2012. P. 437.
30 Yuqing X. Ibid. P. 1.
31 Иноземцев В.Л. Воссоздание индустриального мира. Контуры нового глобального устройства // Россия в глобальной политике. — 2011. — № 6. — Т.9. — С. 89.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content

Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2024