Logo PROBLEMS
OF MODERN
ECONOMICS
Start Page
News
Information About the Journal
About the Editor-in-chief
Advertising
Contacts
EURASIAN INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-ANALYTICAL EDITION Russian
Thematic profile of the Journal
The latest
Issue
Announcement
Issues List
Find
Editorial Council
Editorial Board
Magazine Representatives
Article Submission Guidelines
PROBLEMS OF MODERN ECONOMICS, N 4 (48), 2013
ECONOMICS, MANAGEMENT, AND ACCOUNTING AT THE ENTERPRICE
Pakhomova L. A.
PhD student, Chair of Operational Management, St. Petersburg State University

Strategic management of the companies’ innovative activity: evolution of the concepts (Russia, St. Petersburg)
The article discusses the evolution of approaches to the strategic management, describes its major features and systematizes it based on the latest research works
Key words: innovation activity, science-and-technology developments, strategic management, evolution of approaches
Pages: 152 - 154


Ëèòåðàòóðà
1. Êàòüêàëî Â.Ñ., Ýâîëþöèÿ òåîðèè ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ. — ÑÏá.: Èçä. äîì Ñ.- Ïåòåðá. ãîñ. óí òà, 2006.
2. Øóìïåòåð É., Òåîðèÿ ýêîíîìè÷åñêîãî ðàçâèòèÿ / Ïåð. Â.Ñ Àâòîíîìîâà è äð. — Ì.: Äèðåêòìåäèÿ Ïàáëèøèíã, 2008.
3. Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation //Journal of economic literature. — 1988. — p. 1120–1171.
4. Hausman J.A., B.H. Hall, and Z. Griliches, Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship, 1984, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
5. Survey, F.C., http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/microdata/documents/CIS_Survey_form_2010.pdf
2010.
6. Laursen, K. and A. Salter, Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms // Strategic management journal. — 2006. — ¹27(2). — p. 131–150.
7. Veugelers R. and B. Cassiman Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firm // Research Policy. — 1999. — ¹28(1). — p. 63–80.
8. Arundel A. The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation // Research Policy. — 2001. — ¹30(4). — p. 611–624.
9. Souder Utility and perceived acceptability of R&D project selectin models // Management Science. — 1973. — ¹19(12). — p. 1384–1394.
10. Davies D. Research planning diagrams // R&d Management. — 1970. — ¹1(1). — p. 22–29.
11. Kantrow A.M. Strategy-technology connection.[Use in decision making] // Harvard Bus. Rev.;(United States). — 1980. — ¹58(4).
12. Pavitt K. What we know about the strategic management of technology1990: California.
13. Quinn, J.B., Managing innovation: controlled chaos // Harvard business review. — 1985. — ¹63(3). — p. 73–84.
14. Nonaka I. and H. Takeuchi The Knowledge Creating. — New York, 1995.
15. Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development // Strategic management journal. — 1992. — ¹13(S1). — p. 111–125.
16. Hamel G. and A. Heene Competence-based competition, 1994.
17. Prahalad C., u. Hamel G.(1990): The Core Competence of the Corporation // Harvard business review. — ¹3. — p. 75–91.
18. Spender J.C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm // Strategic management journal. — 1996. — ¹17. — p. 45–62.
19. Zander U. and B. Kogut Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test // Organization Science. — 1995. — ¹6(1). — p. 76–92.
20. Nieto From R&D management to knowledge management An overview of studies of innovation management. — 2003. — ¹70. — p. 135–161.
21. Souder W.E. Utility and perceived acceptability of R&D project selection models // Management Science. — 1973. — ¹19(12). — p. 1384–1394.
22. Ortt J.R. and P.A. van der Duin The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation //European Journal of Innovation Management. — 2008. — ¹11(4). — p. 522–538.
23. Rothwell R. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process // International marketing review. — 1994. — ¹11(1). — p. 7–31.
24. Cooper R.G., Perspective third-generation new product processes // Journal of Product Innovation Management. — 1994. — ¹11(1). — p. 3–14.
25. Niosi J. Fourth-generation R&D: From linear models to flexible innovation // Journal of business research. — 1999. — ¹45(2). — p. 111–117.
26. Mowery D. and N. Rosenberg The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies // Research Policy. — 1979. — ¹8(2). — p. 102–153.
27. Chesbrough H.W. The era of open innovation // Managing innovation and change. — 2006. — ¹127(3). — p. 34–41.
28. Levinthal D.A. and J.G. March The myopia of learning // Strategic management journal. — 1993. — ¹14(S2). — p. 95–112.
29. Katila R. and G. Ahuja Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction // Academy of management journal. — 2002. — ¹45(6). — p.1183–1194.
30. Cohen W.M., R.R. Nelson, and J.P. Walsh Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not), 2000, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content

Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2025