Article - Problems of Modern Economics

Malikov R. I.
Head of the Chair of Economics and Management, Institute of Economics and Services, Ufa State Oil University of Technology, PhD (Economics), Professor
Grishin K. E.
Chair of Macroeconomic Regulation and State Administration, Deputy Director, Institute of Economics, Finances and Business, Bashkir State University (Ufa), PhD (Economics), Professor
Timirjanova V. M.
Deputy Head of the Academic Laboratory for Research of Regional Socio-Economic Problems, Institute of Economics, Finances and Business, Bashkir State University (Ufa), PhD (Economics)

Sub-regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: paradigm of identification and evaluation (Russia, Ufa)

The article uses an ecosystem approach to discuss development of entrepreneurship on the regional level; this approach allows the author to focus on the specific spatio-temporal context of entrepreneurship. Within the frames of the ecosystem approach one can also take into account the nature of interaction among the economic agents and their relations to the environment where they function.

Key words: entrepreneurship, regions, regional entrepreneurial ecosystems, spatial connectedness, sub-regional entrepreneurial ecosystems

Pages: 139 - 144

Литература
1. Демидова О.А. Пространственно-авторегрессионная модель для двух групп взаимосвязанных регионов (на примере восточной и западной части России) // Прикладная эконометрика. — 2014. — №2 (34). — С. 19–35.
2. Земцов С.П., Бабурин В.Л. Предпринимательские экосистемы в регионах России // Региональные исследования. — 2019. — №2. — С. 4–14. DOI: 10.5922/1994–5280–2019–2–1
3. Тимирьянова В.М., Зимин А.Ф., Жилина Е.В. Пространственная составляющая в изменении розничного рынка товаров // Экономика региона. — 2018. — Т.14, вып. 1. — С. 164–175.
4. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Lehmann E.E., Licht G. National Systems of Entrepreneurship // Small Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 16.№ 4. Р. 527–535. DOI: 10.1007/s11187–016–9705–1.
5. Alvedalen J., Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda // European Planning Studies. 2017 Vol. 25. № 6. P. 887–903
6. Anselin L. Spatial Dependence and Spatial Structural Instability in Applied Regression Analysis // Journal of Regional science. 1990. №30. P. 185–207.
7. Arcuri G., Brunetto M., Levratto N. Spatial patterns and determinants of firm exit: an empirical analysis on France // Springer; Western Regional Science Association. 2019. Vol. 62 №1, pages 99–118, February doi:10.1007/s00168–018–0887–0
8. Audretsch D., Cunningham J.A., Kuratko D., Lehmann E., Menter M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019. Vol. 44 (4). Р. 313 — 325.
9. Audretsch D., Belitski M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions // Journal of Technology Transfer. 2017. Vol. 42 (5). P. 1030–1051. doi.org/10.1007/s10961–016–9473–8
10. Breitenecker R. J., Harms R., Weyh A., Maresch D., Kraus S. When the difference makes a difference — the regional embeddedness of entrepreneurship // Entrepreneurship & Regional Development. 2016. Vol. 29.№ 1–2. Р. 71–93.doi:10.1080/08985626.2016.1255432
11. Demidova O. Spatial effects for the eastern and western regions of Russia: a comparative analysis // International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies. 2015. №8 (2). Р.153–168. doi:10.1504/ijepee.2015.069594.
12. Freeman John H., Audia Pino G. Community Ecology and the Sociology of Organizations // Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 32. August 2006. Available at SSRN. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1082494
13. Geary R. The continiguity ratio and statistical mapping // The Incorporated Statistician, 1954. Vol. 5. P.115 — 145.
14. Galateanu E., Avasilcai S. Business ecosystem architecture // Annals of the Oradea University. 2013. Issue 1. Р. 79–84.
15. Gossain S., Kandiah G. Reinventing Value: The New Business Ecosystem // Strategy& Leadership. 1998.Vol. 26(5). Р. 28–33.
16. Hong E., Lee I. H., Sun L., Harrison R. Entrepreneurship across time and space: empirical evidence from Korea // Small Business Economics. 2014. Vol. 44(3). Р. 705–719. doi:10.1007/s11187–014–9613–1
17. Isenberg D. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Dublin, from DanIsenberg 2011. URL: http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com/2011/05/11/the-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-as-a-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy-principles-for-cultivating-entrepreneurship/
18. Lewin R., Regine B. On the Edge in the World of Business // In: Lewin R. Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. The University of Chicago Press.1999. Р. 197–211.
19. Moore J. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition // Harvard Business Review. 1993. № 71. Р. 76–86.
20. Moran P. The interpretation of statistical maps // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1948. Series B. 10. P.243 — 251.
21. Plummer L. A. Spatial Dependence in Entrepreneurship Research // Organizational Research Methods. 2009. Vol. 13(1). Р. 146–175.doi:10.1177/1094428109334199
22. Qian H., Zhao C. Space-time analysis of high technology entrepreneurship: A comparison of California and New England // Applied Geography. 2018. Vol. 95. Р. 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.006
23. Ragoubi H., El Harbi S. Entrepreneurship and income inequality: a spatial panel data analysis // International Review of Applied Economics. 2017. Vol. 32(3). Р. 374–422.doi:10.1080/02692171.2017.1342776
24. Shane S., Venkataraman S. The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research // Academy of Management Review. 2000.Vol. 25, Р. 217–226.
25. Stam E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique // European Planning Studies 2015.Vol. 23(9). Р. 1759–1769.
26. Spigel B. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 2017. Vol. 41(1). P. 49–72.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content


Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2024