Article - Problems of Modern Economics

Puntsukova S. D.
Leading research fellow, Laboratory of Economics of Nature Management Baikal Institute of Nature Management, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, PhD (Geography)

Contribution of forests of Selenga river basin into the economic development of transborder territories (Republic of Buryatia, Mongolia) (Russia, Ulan-Ude)

The article focuses on evaluation of direct and indirect contribution of forests into economic development and describes the conceptual basis of the research based on the ecosystem approach and criteria of forest management that regards connections among the ecosystem forest services and various forms of territorial economic contributions, including formal and non-formal economic sectors. Evaluation of forest value in transborder territories showed that different contribution of the forests into the regional economy is conditioned by climatic specificities, the quality of the forest fund, the degree of forestry activities, as well as methods of forest management. Research conducted allows to emphasize the importance of transition from protective type of forest management to the principles of sustainable development, based on preservation and simultaneous enhancing the economic, social and ecological value of forests.

Key words: forest ecosystem, value of ecosystem services, revenues, advantages, Selenga river basin

Pages: 195 - 200

Литература
1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). State of the World’s Forests: Enhancing the Socioeconomic Benefits from Forests. Rome. 2014. URL: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3710e.pdf (дата обращения: 22.12.2019)
2. Экосистемы бассейна Селенги: научное издание / Отв. ред. Е.А. Востокова, П.С. Гунин. — М: Наука, 2005. — Т. 44. — 359 с.
3. Постановление от 10 ноября 2015 г. № 567 »О внесении изменений в постановление Правительства Республики Бурятия от 31.12.2008 № 608 «Об утверждении Лесного плана Республики Бурятия»
4. Монгол улсын статистикийн эмхэтгэл. Mongolian Statistical Yearbook. 2015. Улаан-Баатар. 2016. URL: http://1212.mn/BookLibraryDownload.ashx?url=Yearbook2015.pdf&ln=En (дата обращения 24.09.2017).
5. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystems and Human Well–Being: Synthesis. Island Press , Washington, D.C. 2005. ISBN-13: 9781597260404.
6. Pagiola, S., von Ritter, K., Bishop, J. Assessing the Economic Value of Ecosystem Conservation. Environmental Economics Series. World Bank, Washington D.C. 2004.
7. Costanza R., R. D’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. O’Neil, R. Raskin, P. Sutton P. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 1997. — 387(6630). — pp. 253- 260
8. Pagiola, S., von Ritter, K., Bishop, J. How Much is an Ecosystem Worth? Assessing the Economic Value of Conservation. World Bank, Washington D.C. 2004.
9. Freeman, A. M. The Measurement of Environment economic and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. 2nd edn. Washington: Resources for the Future. 2003.
10. Pearce, D. Economic Values and the Natural World. Earthscan, London. 1993.
11. Hanneman, W. M. 1991. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? American Economic Review, 1993. –.81 (3). — 635–647.
12. Замолодчиков Д.Г., Грабовский В.И., Краев Г.Н. Динамика бюджета углерода лесов России за два последних десятилетия // Лесоведение. — 2011. — № 6. — C. 16–28.
13. Промышленное производство в Республике Бурятия. Статистический сборник / Бурятстат — Улан-Удэ, 2017. — 85 с.
14. Puntsukova S., Tsendsuren D. Comparative Analysis of Carbon Budget in Forests of the Selenga River Transboundary Basin // Geography and Natural Resources. — 2019. — Vol. 40. — No. 2. — pp. 144–150. DOI: 10.1134/S1875372819020070
15. Государственный доклад «О состоянии и об охране окружающей среды Республики Бурятия в 2017 году». Улан-Удэ.: Минприроды РБ, 2018. 232 с.
16. An Economic Valuation of Contribution of Ecosystem Services of the Network of Protected Areas to the Economy of Mongolia Book, 2015. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291693931 (дата обращения: 22.12.2019)
18. National Biodiversity Program (2015–2025) Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. 2015. URL: https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/mn/mn-nbsap-v2-en.pdf (дата обращения: 22.12.2019)
19. Кобак К.И. Кукуев Ю.А., Трейфельд Р.Ф. Роль лесов в изменении содержания углерода в атмосфере // Лесное хозяйство. — 2001. — № 2. — С. 43–45.
20. На совете по развитию туризма в Бурятии подвели итоги уходящего года URL: http://www.nia-rf.ru/news/society/54508?utm_source=yxnews&utm_medium=desktop&utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.ru%2Fnews1 (дата обращения: 12.05.2020)
21. Financing mechanisms and options for implementing REDD+ in Mongolian. Technical Report. 2018. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330000028_(дата обращения: 22.12.2019)
22. Ежегодник ФАО. Лесная продукция — 2017. URL: http://www.fao.org/forestry/statistics/80570/ru/ (дата обращения: 03.04.2020)
23. Монголия хочет привлекать туристов историями о Чингисхане. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/economy/2616970.html (дата обращения: 12.05.2020)
24. Петров В.Н., Каткова Т.Б., Карвинен С. Сравнительный анализ экономических показателей лесного хозяйства России и Финляндии // Экономический журнал ВШЭ. — 2018. — Т. 22. — № 2. — С. 294–319.

Article in russian

Back to the issue content


Copyright © Problems of Modern Economics 2002 - 2024